Chitooligosaccharides and methods for use in enhancing plant growth

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are methods of enhancing plant growth, comprising treating plant seed or the plant that germinates from the seed with an effective amount of at least one chitooligosaccharide, wherein upon harvesting the plant exhibits at least one of increased plant yield measured in terms of bushels/acre, increased root number, increased root length, increased root mass, increased root volume and increased leaf area, compared to untreated plants or plants harvested from untreated seed.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.16/236,746 filed on Dec. 31, 2018 (Now allowed) which is a continuationof U.S. application Ser. No. 15/206,507 filed Jul. 11, 2016, now U.S.Pat. No. 10,206,396 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.14/709,769 filed May 12, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,414,592, which is acontinuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/625,393 filed on Sep. 24,2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,055,746, which claims priority or the benefitunder 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. provisional application No. 61/538,326 filedSep. 23, 2011, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein byreference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The symbiosis between the gram-negative soil bacteria, Rhizobiaceae andBradyrhizobiaceae, and legumes such as soybean, is well documented. Thebiochemical basis for these relationships includes an exchange ofmolecular signaling, wherein the plant-to-bacteria signal compoundsinclude flavones, isoflavones and flavanones, and the bacteria-to-plantsignal compounds, which include the end products of the expression ofthe bradyrhizobial and rhizobial nod genes, known aslipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs). The symbiosis between these bacteriaand the legumes enables the legume to fix atmospheric nitrogen for plantgrowth, thus obviating a need for nitrogen fertilizers. Since nitrogenfertilizers can significantly increase the cost of crops and areassociated with a number of polluting effects, the agricultural industrycontinues its efforts to exploit this biological relationship anddevelop new agents and methods for improving plant yield withoutincreasing the use of nitrogen-based fertilizers.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,979,664 teaches a method for enhancing seed germinationor seedling emergence of a plant crop, comprising the steps of providinga composition that comprises an effective amount of at least onelipo-chitooligosaccharide and an agriculturally suitable carrier andapplying the composition in the immediate vicinity of a seed or seedlingin an effective amount for enhancing seed germination of seedlingemergence in comparison to an untreated seed or seedling.

Further development on this concept is taught in WO 2005/062899,directed to combinations of at least one plant inducer, namely an LCO,in combination with a fungicide, insecticide, or combination thereof, toenhance a plant characteristic such as plant stand, growth, vigor and/oryield. The compositions and methods are taught to be applicable to bothlegumes and non-legumes, and may be used to treat a seed (just prior toplanting), seedling, root or plant.

Similarly, WO 2008/085958 teaches compositions for enhancing plantgrowth and crop yield in both legumes and non-legumes, and which containLCOs in combination with another active agent such as a chitin orchitosan, a flavonoid compound, or an herbicide, and which can beapplied to seeds and/or plants concomitantly or sequentially. As in thecase of the '899 Publication, the '958 Publication teaches treatment ofseeds just prior to planting.

More recently, Halford, “Smoke Signals,” in Chem. Eng. News (Apr. 12,2010), at pages 37-38, reports that karrikins or butenolides which arecontained in smoke act as growth stimulants and spur seed germinationafter a forest fire, and can invigorate seeds such as corn, tomatoes,lettuce and onions that had been stored. These molecules are the subjectof U.S. Pat. No. 7,576,213.

There is, however, still a need for systems for improving or enhancingplant growth.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first aspect of the present invention is directed to a method ofenhancing plant growth, comprising a) treating (e.g., applying to) plantseed or a plant that germinates from the seed, with an effective amountof at least one chitooligosaccharide (CO), wherein upon harvesting theplant exhibits at least one of increased plant yield measured in termsof bushels/acre, increased root number, increased root length, increasedroot mass, increased root volume and increased leaf area, compared tountreated plants or plants harvested from untreated seed.

In some embodiments, at least two CO's are used. In some embodiments,treatment of the seed includes direct application of the at least one COonto the seed, which may then be planted or stored for a period of timeprior to planting. Treatment of the seed may also include indirecttreatment such as by introducing the at least one CO into the soil(known in the art as in-furrow application). In yet other embodiments,the at least one CO may be applied to the plant that germinates from theseed, e.g., via foliar spray. The methods may further include use ofother agronomically beneficial agents, such as micronutrients, fattyacids and derivatives thereof, plant signal molecules (other than CO's),such as lipo-chitooligosaccharides, chitinous compounds (other thanCOs), flavonoids, jasmonic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid andtheir derivatives, and karrikins), herbicides, fungicides andinsecticides, phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms, diazotrophs(Rhizobial inoculants), and/or mycorrhizal fungi,

The methods of the present invention are applicable to legumes andnon-legumes alike. In some embodiments, the leguminous seed is soybeanseed. In some other embodiments, the seed that is treated isnon-leguminous seed such as a field crop seed, e.g., a cereal such ascorn, or a vegetable crop seed such as potato.

As demonstrated by the working examples, which summarize experimentsconducted in both the greenhouse and in the field, the results achievedby the methods of the present invention show that application of atleast one CO to seed or a plant that germinates from a seed, results inenhanced plant growth. These results are believed to be unexpected,particularly from the standpoint that COs were known to be involved insystem acquired resistance (SAR) but not necessarily involved in thedirect enhancement of plant growth. The results described herein showthat in some cases, the inventive methods achieved a substantially equaleffect or in some other cases, outperformed the enhancement of plantgrowth achieved by an LCO. The results obtained from the greenhouseexperiments are particularly significant in this regard, in that theywere conducted in substantially disease-free conditions.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1a and 2a show the chemical structures of chitooligosaccharidecompounds (CO's) useful in the practice of the present invention.

FIGS. 1b and 2b show the chemical structures of thelipo-chitooligosaccharide compounds (LCO's) that correspond to the CO'sin FIGS. 1a and 2a , and which are also useful in the practice of thepresent invention.

FIGS. 3a and 4a show the chemical structures of other CO's useful in thepractice of the present invention.

FIGS. 3b and 4b show the chemical structures of the Myc-factors thatcorrespond to the CO's in FIGS. 3a and 3b , and which are also useful inthe practice of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of an inventive CO(illustrated in FIG. 2a ) at three different concentrations (10⁻⁷, 10⁻⁸and 10⁻⁹ M) compared to two different sources of the LCO illustrated inFIG. 1b , and a control, treated on tomato seeds, expressed in terms ofseedling average root length.

FIG. 6 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the inventive CO(illustrated in FIG. 2a ) at three different concentrations (10⁻⁷, 10⁻⁸and 10⁻⁹ M) compared to two different sources of the LCO illustrated inFIG. 1b , and a control, treated on tomato seeds, expressed in terms ofseedling average root fresh weight.

FIG. 7 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the inventive CO(illustrated in FIG. 2a ) at a mean concentration (of threeconcentrations) compared to two different sources of the LCO illustratedin FIG. 1b , treated on tomato seeds, expressed in terms of seedlingaverage root length.

FIG. 8 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the inventive CO(illustrated in FIG. 2a ) at a mean concentration (of threeconcentrations) compared to two different sources of the LCO illustratedin FIG. 1b , treated on tomato plants, expressed in terms of seedlingaverage root fresh weight.

FIG. 9 is a bar graph that illustrates the effect of the inventive CO(illustrated in FIG. 2a ) compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b ,and a control, treated on cotton plants, expressed in terms of averagedry weight of each seedling per treatment.

FIGS. 10 (trial 1) and 11 (trial 2) are bar graphs that show the effectof the CO illustrated in FIG. 2a , compared to the LCO illustrated inFIG. 2b , and a mixture of (non-inventive) chitinous compounds producedby chitinase, treated on corn seed, expressed in terms of average dryweight of shoots, roots and total dry weight (combined dry weight ofshoots and roots).

FIG. 12 is a bar graph that illustrates the effect of the CO illustratedin FIG. 2a , compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , a mixture ofCO's produced by chitinase, an isoflavonoid, and a control, treated onsoybean seed, expressed in terms of leaf surface area.

FIG. 13 is a bar graph that illustrates the effect of the CO illustratedin FIG. 2a , the LCO illustrated in FIG. 1b , an isoflavonoid, and themixture of the non-inventive chitinous compounds (obtained from chitosanvia an enzymatic process), treated on soybean seeds, expressed in termsof average dry weight of soybean plant.

FIG. 14 is a bar graph that illustrates the effect of the CO illustratedin FIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one or two fatty acids,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, on deformationof Siratro root hair, expressed in terms of percent.

FIG. 15 is a graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated in FIG.2a , alone or in combination with one or two fatty acids, compared tothe LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, treated on canola seed,expressed in terms of percent of seed germination.

FIG. 16 is a graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated in FIG.2a , alone or in combination with one or two fatty acids, compared tothe LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, treated on wheat seed,expressed in terms of percent of seed germination.

FIG. 17 is a graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated in FIG.2a , alone or in combination with one or two fatty acids, compared tothe LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, treated on alfalfa seed,expressed in terms of percent of seed germination.

FIG. 18 is a pie-chart that illustrates the effect of the CO illustratedin FIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fattyacids, compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, treatedon corn seed, expressed in terms of percent of seed germination.

FIG. 19 is a graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated in FIG.2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fatty acids,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , each of the fatty acidsalone, and a control, treated on corn seed, expressed in terms ofpercent of seed germination.

FIG. 20 is a graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated in FIG.2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fatty acids, theCO plus both fatty acids, compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b ,and a control, treated on wheat seed, expressed in terms of percent ofseed germination.

FIG. 21 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one of four different fattyacids, compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, treatedon Vicia sativa seed, expressed in terms of percent of seed germination.

FIG. 22 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fatty acids,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and a control, treated onthe roots of Vicia sativa, expressed in terms of average root length.

FIG. 23 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fatty acids,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, treated on greenmung, lab lab, red lentil and red clover seed, expressed in terms ofpercent of seed germination.

FIG. 24 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fatty acids,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water, on tomatoseedling growth, expressed in terms of average root length.

FIG. 25 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with one of two different fatty acids,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 1b , on soybean seed, expressedin terms of average radicle length.

FIG. 26 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b , and water,treated on cotton seed, expressed in terms of average plant dry weight.

FIG. 27 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 1b , and a mixture ofCO's produced by chitinase, treated on soybean plants, expressed interms of average plant dry biomass.

FIG. 28 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b ,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b and water, treated on cornseed, expressed in terms of average plant dry weight.

FIG. 29 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b ,compared to the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b and water, treated on sorghumseed, expressed in terms of average seedling root length.

FIG. 30 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with a micronutrient, compared towater, treated on cotton plants, expressed in terms of averagechlorophyll content.

FIG. 31 is a bar graph that illustrates effect of the CO illustrated inFIG. 2a , alone or in combination with a micronutrient, compared towater, treated on cotton plants, expressed in terms of average plant dryweight.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION Chitooligosaccharides

COs are known in the art as β-1-4 linked N-acetyl glucosamine structuresidentified as chitin oligomers, also as N-acetylchitooligosaccharides.CO's have unique and different side chain decorations which make themdifferent from chitin molecules [(C₈H₁₃NO₅)_(n), CAS No. 1398-61-4], andchitosan molecules [(C₅H₁₁NO₄)_(n), CAS No. 9012-76-4]. See, e.g.,Hamel, et al., Planta 232:787-806 (2010)(e.g., FIG. 1 which showsstructures of chitin, chitosan, Nod factors (LCO's), and thecorresponding CO's (which would lack the 18C, 16C, or 20C acyl group)).The CO's of the present invention are also relatively water-solublecompared to chitin and chitosan, and in some embodiments, as describedhereinbelow, are pentameric. Representative literature describing thestructure and production of COs that may be suitable for use in thepresent invention is as follows: Muller, et al., Plant Physiol.124:733-9 (2000)(e.g., FIG. 1 therein); Van der Holst, et al., CurrentOpinion in Structural Biology, 11:608-616 (2001)(e.g., FIG. 1 therein);Robina, et al., Tetrahedron 58:521-530 (2002); D'Haeze, et al.,Glycobiol. 12(6):79R-105R (2002); Rouge, et al. Chapter 27, “TheMolecular Immunology of Complex Carbohydrates” in Advances inExperimental Medicine and Biology, Springer Science; Wan, et al., PlantCell 21:1053-69 (2009); PCT/F100/00803 (Sep. 21, 2000); andDemont-Caulet, et al., Plant Physiol. 120(1):83-92 (1999).

CO's differ from LCO's in terms of structure mainly in that they lackthe pendant fatty acid chain. Rhizobia-derived CO's, and non-naturallyoccurring synthetic derivatives thereof, that may be useful in thepractice of the present invention may be represented by the followingformula:

wherein R₁ and R₂ each independently represents hydrogen or methyl; R₃represents hydrogen, acetyl or carbamoyl; R₄ represents hydrogen, acetylor carbamoyl; R₅ represents hydrogen, acetyl or carbamoyl; R₆ representshydrogen, arabinosyl, fucosyl, acetyl, sulfate ester, 3-0-S-2-0-MeFuc,2-0-MeFuc, and 4-0-AcFuc; R₇ represents hydrogen, mannosyl or glycerol;R₈ represents hydrogen, methyl, or —CH₂OH; R₉ represents hydrogen,arabinosyl, or fucosyl; Rio represents hydrogen, acetyl or fucosyl; andn represents 0, 1, 2 or 3. The structures of corresponding RhizobialLCO's are described in D'Haeze, et al., supra.

Two CO's suitable for use in the present invention are illustrated inFIGS. 1a and 2a . They correspond to LCO's produced by Bradyrhizobiumjaponicum and Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae which interactsymbiotically with soybean and pea, respectively, but lack the fattyacid chains. The corresponding LCO's produced by these rhizobia (andwhich are also useful in the practice of the present invention) areillustrated in FIGS. 1b and 2 b.

The structures of yet other CO's that may be suitable for use in thepractice of the present invention are easily derivable from LCOsobtained (i.e., isolated and/or purified) from a mycorrhizal fungi, suchas fungi of the group Glomerocycota, e.g., Glomus intraradices. See,e.g., WO 2010/049751 and Maillet, et al., Nature 469:58-63 (2011) (theLCOs described therein also referred to as “Myc factors”).Representative mycorrhizal fungi-derived CO's are represented by thefollowing structure:

wherein n=1 or 2; R₁ represents hydrogen or methyl; and R₂ representshydrogen or SO₃H. Two other CO's suitable for use in the presentinvention, one of which is sulfated, and the other being non-sulfated,are illustrated in FIGS. 3a and 4a respectively. They correspond to twodifferent LCO's produced by the mycorrhizal fungi Glomas intraradiceswhich are illustrated in FIGS. 3b and 4b (and which are also useful inthe practice of the present invention).

The COs may be synthetic or recombinant. Methods for preparation ofsynthetic CO's are described, for example, in Robina, supra., Methodsfor producing recombinant CO's e.g., using E. coli as a host, are knownin the art. See, e.g., Dumon, et al., ChemBioChem 7:359-65 (2006),Samain, et al., Carbohydrate Res. 302:35-42 (1997); Cottaz, et al.,Meth. Eng. 7(4):311-7 (2005) and Samain, et al., J. Biotechnol. 72:33-47(1999)(e.g., FIG. 1 therein which shows structures of CO's that can bemade recombinantly in E. coli harboring different combinations of genesnodBCHL). For purposes of the present invention, the at least one CO isstructurally distinct from chitins, chitosans, and otherchitooligosaccharides made enzymatically using chitin as a startingmaterial.

For the purposes of the present invention, the at least one recombinantCO is at least 60% pure, e.g., at least 60% pure, at least 65% pure, atleast 70% pure, at least 75% pure, at least 80% pure, at least 85% pure,at least 90% pure, at least 91% pure, at least 92% pure, at least 93%pure, at least 94% pure, at least 95% pure, at least 96% pure, at least97% pure, at least 98% pure, at least 99% pure, up to 100% pure.

Seeds may be treated with the at least one CO in several ways such asspraying or dripping. Spray and drip treatment may be conducted byformulating an effective amount of the at least one CO in anagriculturally acceptable carrier, typically aqueous in nature, andspraying or dripping the composition onto seed via a continuous treatingsystem (which is calibrated to apply treatment at a predefined rate inproportion to the continuous flow of seed), such as a drum-type oftreater. These methods advantageously employ relatively small volumes ofcarrier so as to allow for relatively fast drying of the treated seed.In this fashion, large volumes of seed can be efficiently treated. Batchsystems, in which a predetermined batch size of seed and signal moleculecompositions are delivered into a mixer, may also be employed. Systemsand apparatus for performing these processes are commercially availablefrom numerous suppliers, e.g., Bayer CropScience (Gustafson).

In another embodiment, the treatment entails coating seeds with the atleast one CO. One such process involves coating the inside wall of around container with the composition, adding seeds, then rotating thecontainer to cause the seeds to contact the wall and the composition, aprocess known in the art as “container coating”. Seeds can be coated bycombinations of coating methods. Soaking typically entails use of anaqueous solution containing the plant growth enhancing agent. Forexample, seeds can be soaked for about 1 minute to about 24 hours (e.g.,for at least 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 40 min, 80 min, 3 hr, 6 hr,12 hr, 24 hr). Some types of seeds (e.g., soybean seeds) tend to besensitive to moisture. Thus, soaking such seeds for an extended periodof time may not be desirable, in which case the soaking is typicallycarried out for about 1 minute to about 20 minutes.

In those embodiments that entail storage of seed after application ofthe at least one CO, adherence of the CO to the seed over any portion oftime of the storage period is not critical. Without intending to bebound by any particular theory of operation, Applicants believe thateven to the extent that the treating may not cause the plant signalmolecule to remain in contact with the seed surface after treatment andduring any part of storage, the CO may achieve its intended effect by aphenomenon known as seed memory or seed perception. See, Macchiavelli,et al., J. Exp. Bot. 55(408):1635-40 (2004). Applicants also believethat following treatment the CO diffuses toward the young developingradicle and activates symbiotic and developmental genes which results ina change in the root architecture of the plant. Notwithstanding, to theextent desirable, the compositions containing the CO may further containa sticking or coating agent. For aesthetic purposes, the compositionsmay further contain a coating polymer and/or a colorant.

The amount of the at least one CO is effective to enhance growth suchthat upon harvesting the plant exhibits at least one of increased plantyield measured in terms of bushels/acre, increased root number,increased root length, increased root mass, increased root volume andincreased leaf area, compared to untreated plants or plants harvestedfrom untreated seed (with either active). The effective amount of the atleast one CO used to treat the seed, expressed in units ofconcentration, generally ranges from about 10⁻⁵ to about 10⁻¹⁴ M (molarconcentration), and in some embodiments, from about 10⁻⁵ to about 10⁻¹¹M, and in some other embodiments from about 10⁻⁷ to about 10⁻⁸ M.Expressed in units of weight, the effective amount generally ranges fromabout 1 to about 400 μg/hundred weight (cwt) seed, and in someembodiments from about 2 to about 70 μg/cwt, and in some otherembodiments, from about 2.5 to about 3.0 μg/cwt seed.

For purposes of treatment of seed indirectly, i.e., in-furrow treatment,the effective amount of the at least one CO generally ranges from about1 μg/acre to about 70 μg/acre, and in some embodiments, from about 50μg/acre to about 60 μg/acre. For purposes of application to the plants,the effective amount of the CO generally ranges from about 1 μg/acre toabout 30 μg/acre, and in some embodiments, from about 11 μg/acre toabout 20 μg/acre.

Seed may be treated with the at least one CO just prior to or at thetime of planting. Treatment at the time of planting may include directapplication to the seed as described above, or in some otherembodiments, by introducing the actives into the soil, known in the artas in-furrow treatment. In those embodiments that entail treatment ofseed followed by storage, the seed may be then packaged, e.g., in 50-lbor 100-lb bags, or bulk bags or containers, in accordance with standardtechniques. The seed may be stored for at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, or 12 months, and even longer, e.g., 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36months, or even longer, under appropriate storage conditions which areknown in the art. Whereas soybean seed may have to be planted thefollowing season, corn seed can be stored for much longer periods oftime including upwards of 3 years.

Other Agronomically Beneficial Agents

The present invention may further include treatment of the seed or theplants that germinate from the seed with at least oneagriculturally/agronomically beneficial agent. As used herein and in theart, the term “agriculturally or agronomically beneficial” refers toagents that when applied to seeds or plants results in enhancement(which may be statistically significant) of plant characteristics suchas plant stand, growth (e.g., as defined in connection with CO's), orvigor in comparison to non-treated seeds or plants. These agents may beformulated together with the at least one CO or applied to the seed orplant via a separate formulation. Representative examples of such agentsthat may be useful in the practice of the present invention includemicronutrients (e.g., vitamins and trace minerals), fatty acids andderivatives thereof, plant signal molecules (other than CO's),herbicides, fungicides and insecticides, phosphate-solubilizingmicroorganisms, diazotrophs (Rhizobial inoculants), and/or mycorrhizalfungi.

Micronutrients

Representative vitamins that may be useful in the practice of thepresent invention include calcium pantothenate, folic acid, biotin, andvitamin C. Representative examples of trace minerals that may be usefulin the practice of the present invention include boron, chlorine,manganese, iron, zinc, copper, molybdenum, nickel, selenium and sodium.

The amount of the at least one micronutrient used to treat the seed,expressed in units of concentration, generally ranges from 10 ppm to 100ppm, and in some embodiments, from about 2 ppm to about 100 ppm.Expressed in units of weight, the effective amount generally ranges inone embodiment from about 180 μg to about 9 mg/hundred weight (cwt)seed, and in some embodiments from about 4 μg to about 200 μg/plant whenapplied on foliage. In other words, for purposes of treatment of seedthe effective amount of the at least one micronutrient generally rangesfrom 30 μg/acre to about 1.5 mg/acre, and in some embodiments, fromabout 120 mg/acre to about 6 g/acre when applied foliarly.

Fatty Acids

Representative fatty acids that may be useful in the practice of thepresent invention include the fatty acids that are substituents onnaturally occurring LCO's, such as stearic and palmitic acids. Otherfatty acids that may be useful include saturated C12-18 fatty acidswhich (aside from palmitic and stearic acids) include lauric acid, andmyristic acid, and unsaturated C12-18 fatty acids such as myristoleicacid, palmitoleic acid, sapienic acid, oleic acid, elaidic acid,vaccenic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, and linoelaidic acid.Linoleic acid and linolenic acid are produced in the course of thebiosynthesis of jasmonic acid (which as described below, is also anagronomically beneficial agent for purposes of the present invention).Linoleic acid and linoleic acid (and their derivatives) are reported tobe inducers of nod gene expression or LCO production by rhizobacteria.See, e.g., Mabood, Fazli, “Linoleic and linolenic acid induce theexpression of nod genes in Bradyrhizobium japonicum,” USDA 3, May 17,2001.

Useful derivatives of fatty acids that may be useful in the practice ofthe present invention include esters, amides, glycosides and salts.Representative esters are compounds in which the carboxyl group of thefatty acid, e.g., linoleic acid and linolenic acid, has been replacedwith a —COR group, where R is an —OR¹ group, in which R¹ is: an alkylgroup, such as a C₁-C₈ unbranched or branched alkyl group, e.g., amethyl, ethyl or propyl group; an alkenyl group, such as a C₂-C₈unbranched or branched alkenyl group; an alkynyl group, such as a C₂-C₈unbranched or branched alkynyl group; an aryl group having, for example,6 to 10 carbon atoms; or a heteroaryl group having, for example, 4 to 9carbon atoms, wherein the heteroatoms in the heteroaryl group can be,for example, N, O, P, or S. Representative amides are compounds in whichthe carboxyl group of the fatty acid, e.g., linoleic acid and linolenicacid, has been replaced with a —COR group, where R is an NR²R³ group, inwhich R² and R³ are independently: hydrogen; an alkyl group, such as aC₁-C₈ unbranched or branched alkyl group, e.g., a methyl, ethyl orpropyl group; an alkenyl group, such as a C₂-C₈ unbranched or branchedalkenyl group; an alkynyl group, such as a C₂-C₈ unbranched or branchedalkynyl group; an aryl group having, for example, 6 to 10 carbon atoms;or a heteroaryl group having, for example, 4 to 9 carbon atoms, whereinthe heteroatoms in the heteroaryl group can be, for example, N, O, P, orS. Esters may be prepared by known methods, such as acid-catalyzednucleophilic addition, wherein the carboxylic acid is reacted with analcohol in the presence of a catalytic amount of a mineral acid. Amidesmay also be prepared by known methods, such as by reacting thecarboxylic acid with the appropriate amine in the presence of a couplingagent such as dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC), under neutral conditions.Suitable salts of fatty acids, e.g., linoleic acid and linolenic acid,include e.g., base addition salts. The bases that may be used asreagents to prepare metabolically acceptable base salts of thesecompounds include those derived from cations such as alkali metalcations (e.g., potassium and sodium) and alkaline earth metal cations(e.g., calcium and magnesium). These salts may be readily prepared bymixing together a solution of the fatty acid with a solution of thebase. The salt may be precipitated from solution and be collected byfiltration or may be recovered by other means such as by evaporation ofthe solvent.

The amounts of the fatty acid or derivative thereof are typicallybetween about 10% to about 30%, and in some embodiments about 25% of theamount of the at least one CO.

Plant Signal Molecules

The present invention may also include treatment of seed or plant with aplant signal molecule other than a CO. For purposes of the presentinvention, the term “plant signal molecule”, which may be usedinterchangeably with “plant growth-enhancing agent” broadly refers toany agent, both naturally occurring in plants or microbes, and synthetic(and which may be non-naturally occurring) that directly or indirectlyactivates a plant biochemical pathway, resulting in increased plantgrowth, measureable at least in terms of at least one of increased yieldmeasured in terms of bushels/acre, increased root number, increased rootlength, increased root mass, increased root volume and increased leafarea, compared to untreated plants or plants harvested from untreatedseed. Representative examples of plant signal molecules that may beuseful in the practice of the present invention includelipo-chitooligosaccharides, chitinous compounds (other than COs),flavonoids, jasmonic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid and theirderivatives (supra), and karrikins.

Lipo-chitooligosaccharide compounds (LCO's), also known in the art assymbiotic Nod signals or Nod factors, consist of an oligosaccharidebackbone of β-1,4-linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (“GlcNAc”) residues withan N-linked fatty acyl chain condensed at the non-reducing end. LCO'sdiffer in the number of GlcNAc residues in the backbone, in the lengthand degree of saturation of the fatty acyl chain, and in thesubstitutions of reducing and non-reducing sugar residues. See, e.g.,Denarie, et al., Ann. Rev. Biochem. 65:503-35 (1996), Hamel, et al.,supra., Prome, et al., Pure & Appl. Chem. 70(1):55-60 (1998). An exampleof an LCO is presented below as formula I

in which:

G is a hexosamine which can be substituted, for example, by an acetylgroup on the nitrogen, a sulfate group, an acetyl group and/or an ethergroup on an oxygen,

R₁, R₂, R₃, R₅, R₆ and R₇, which may be identical or different,represent H, CH₃ CO—, C_(x) H_(y) CO— where x is an integer between 0and 17, and y is an integer between 1 and 35, or any other acyl groupsuch as for example a carbamoyl,

R₄ represents a mono-, di- or triunsaturated aliphatic chain containingat least 12 carbon atoms, and n is an integer between 1 and 4.

LCOs may be obtained (isolated and/or purified) from bacteria such asRhizobia, e.g., Rhizobium sp., Bradyrhizobium sp., Sinorhizobium sp. andAzorhizobium sp. LCO structure is characteristic for each such bacterialspecies, and each strain may produce multiple LCO's with differentstructures. For example, specific LCOs from S. meliloti have also beendescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,718 as having the formula II:

in which R represents H or CH₃ CO— and n is equal to 2 or 3.

Even more specific LCOs include NodRM, NodRM-1, NodRM-3. When acetylated(the R=CH₃ CO—), they become AcNodRM-1, and AcNodRM-3, respectively(U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,718).

LCOs from Bradyrhizobium japonicum are described in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,175,149 and 5,321,011. Broadly, they are pentasaccharide phytohormonescomprising methylfucose. A number of these B. japonicum-derived LCOs aredescribed: BjNod-V (C_(18:1)); BjNod-V (Ac, C_(18:1)), BjNod-V(C_(16:1)); and BjNod-V (Ac, C_(16:0)), with “V” indicating the presenceof five N-acetylglucosamines; “Ac” an acetylation; the number followingthe “C” indicating the number of carbons in the fatty acid side chain;and the number following the “:” the number of double bonds.

LCO's used in embodiments of the invention may be obtained (i.e.,isolated and/or purified) from bacterial strains that produce LCO's,such as strains of Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium (including B.japonicum), Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium (including R. leguminosarum),Sinorhizobium (including S. meliloti), and bacterial strains geneticallyengineered to produce LCO's.

LCO's are the primary determinants of host specificity in legumesymbiosis (Diaz, et al., Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions 13:268-276(2000)). Thus, within the legume family, specific genera and species ofrhizobia develop a symbiotic nitrogen-fixing relationship with aspecific legume host. These plant-host/bacteria combinations aredescribed in Hungria, et al., Soil Biol. Biochem. 29:819-830 (1997),Examples of these bacteria/legume symbiotic partnerships include S.meliloti/alfalfa and sweet clover; R. leguminosarum biovar viciae/peasand lentils; R. leguminosarum biovar phaseoli/beans; Bradyrhizobiumjaponicum/soybeans; and R. leguminosarum biovar trifolii/red clover.Hungria also lists the effective flavonoid Nod gene inducers of therhizobial species, and the specific LCO structures that are produced bythe different rhizobial species. However, LCO specificity is onlyrequired to establish nodulation in legumes. In the practice of thepresent invention, use of a given LCO is not limited to treatment ofseed of its symbiotic legume partner, in order to achieve increasedplant yield measured in terms of bushels/acre, increased root number,increased root length, increased root mass, increased root volume andincreased leaf area, compared to plants harvested from untreated seed,or compared to plants harvested from seed treated with the signalmolecule just prior to or within a week or less of planting.

Thus, by way of further examples, LCO's and non-naturally occurringderivatives thereof that may be useful in the practice of the presentinvention are represented by the following formula:

wherein R₁ represents C14:0, 3OH—C14:0, iso-C15:0, C16:0, 3-OH—C16:0,iso-C15:0, C16:1, C16:2, C16:3, iso-C17:0, iso-C17:1, C18:0, 3OH—C18:0,C18:0/3-OH, C18:1, OH—C18:1, C18:2, C18:3, C18:4, C19:1 carbamoyl,C20:0, C20:1, 3-OH—C20:1, C20:1/3-OH, C20:2, C20:3, C22:1, andC18-26(ω-1)-OH (which according to D'Haeze, et al., supra, includes C18,C20, C22, C24 and C26 hydroxylated species and C16:1Δ9, C16:2 (Δ2,9) andC16:3 (Δ2,4,9)); R₂ represents hydrogen or methyl; R₃ representshydrogen, acetyl or carbamoyl; R₄ represents hydrogen, acetyl orcarbamoyl; R₅ represents hydrogen, acetyl or carbamoyl; R₆ representshydrogen, arabinosyl, fucosyl, acetyl, sulfate ester, 3-0-S-2-0-MeFuc,2-0-MeFuc, and 4-0-AcFuc; R₇ represents hydrogen, mannosyl or glycerol;R₈ represents hydrogen, methyl, or —CH₂OH; R₉ represents hydrogen,arabinosyl, or fucosyl; Rio represents hydrogen, acetyl or fucosyl; andn represents 0, 1, 2 or 3. The structures of the naturally occurringRhizobial LCO's embraced by this structure are described in D'Haeze, etal., supra.

By way of even further additional examples, an LCO obtained from B.japonicum, illustrated in FIG. 1b , may be used to treat leguminous seedother than soybean and non-leguminous seed such as corn. As anotherexample, the LCO obtainable from R. leguminosarum illustrated in FIG. 2b(designated LCO-V (C18:1), SP104) can be used to treat leguminous seedother than pea and non-legumes too.

Also encompassed by the present invention is use of LCOs obtained (i.e.,isolated and/or purified) from a mycorrhizal fungi, such as fungi of thegroup Glomerocycota, e.g., Glomus intraradices. The structures ofrepresentative LCOs obtained from these fungi are described in WO2010/049751 and WO 2010/049751 (the LCOs described therein also referredto as “Myc factors”). Representative mycorrhizal fungi-derived CO's andnon-naturally occurring derivatives thereof are represented by thefollowing structure:

wherein n=1 or 2; R₁ represents C16, C16:0, C16:1, C16:2, C18:0,C18:1Δ₉Z or C18:1Δ11Z; and R₂ represents hydrogen or SO₃H. In someembodiments, the LCO's are produced by the mycorrhizal fungi which areillustrated in FIGS. 3b and 4 b.

Further encompassed by the present invention is use of synthetic LCOcompounds, such as those described in WO 2005/063784, and recombinantLCO's produced through genetic engineering. The basic, naturallyoccurring LCO structure may contain modifications or substitutions foundin naturally occurring LCO's, such as those described in Spaink, Crit.Rev. Plant Sci. 54:257-288 (2000) and D'Haeze, et al., Glycobiology12:79R-105R (2002). Precursor oligosaccharide molecules (COs, which asdescribed below, are also useful as plant signal molecules in thepresent invention) for the construction of LCOs may also be synthesizedby genetically engineered organisms, e.g., as described in Samain, etal., Carbohydrate Res. 302:35-42 (1997); Cottaz, et al., Meth. Eng.7(4):311-7 (2005) and Samain, et al., J. Biotechnol. 72:33-47(1999)(e.g., FIG. 1 therein which shows structures of LCO's that can bemade recombinantly in E. coli harboring different combinations of genesnodBCHL).

LCO's may be utilized in various forms of purity and may be used aloneor in the form of a culture of LCO-producing bacteria or fungi. Forexample, OPTIMIZE® (commercially available from Novozymes BioAg Limited)contains a culture of B. japonicum that produces an LCO (LCO-V(C18:1,MeFuc), MOR116) that is illustrated in FIG. 1b Methods to providesubstantially pure LCO's include simply removing the microbial cellsfrom a mixture of LCOs and the microbe, or continuing to isolate andpurify the LCO molecules through LCO solvent phase separation followedby HPLC chromatography as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No.5,549,718. Purification can be enhanced by repeated HPLC, and thepurified LCO molecules can be freeze-dried for long-term storage.Chitooligosaccharides (COs) as described above, may be used as startingmaterials for the production of synthetic LCOs. For the purposes of thepresent invention, recombinant LCO's are at least 60% pure, e.g., atleast 60% pure, at least 65% pure, at least 70% pure, at least 75% pure,at least 80% pure, at least 85% pure, at least 90% pure, at least 91%pure, at least 92% pure, at least 93% pure, at least 94% pure, at least95% pure, at least 96% pure, at least 97% pure, at least 98% pure, atleast 99% pure, up to 100% pure.

Chitins and chitosans, which are major components of the cell walls offungi and the exoskeletons of insects and crustaceans, are also composedof GlcNAc residues. Chitinous compounds include chitin, (IUPAC:N-[5-[[3-acetylamino-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2yl]methoxymethyl]-2-[[5-acetylamino-4,6-dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-yl]methoxymethyl]-4-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-ys]ethanamide),and chitosan, (IUPAC:5-amino-6-[5-amino-6-[5-amino-4,6-dihydroxy-2(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-yl]oxy-4-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-yl]oxy-2(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4-diol).These compounds may be obtained commercially, e.g., from Sigma-Aldrich,or prepared from insects, crustacean shells, or fungal cell walls.Methods for the preparation of chitin and chitosan are known in the art,and have been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,207(preparation from crustacean shells), Pochanavanich, et al., Lett. Appl.Microbiol. 35:17-21 (2002) (preparation from fungal cell walls), andU.S. Pat. No. 5,965,545 (preparation from crab shells and hydrolysis ofcommercial chitosan). See, also, Jung, et al., Carbohydrate Polymers67:256-59 (2007); Khan, et al., Photosynthetica 40(4):621-4 (2002).Deacetylated chitins and chitosans may be obtained that range from lessthan 35% to greater than 90% deacetylation, and cover a broad spectrumof molecular weights, e.g., low molecular weight chitosan oligomers ofless than 15 kD and chitin oligomers of 0.5 to 2 kD; “practical grade”chitosan with a molecular weight of about 15 OkD; and high molecularweight chitosan of up to 70 OkD. Chitin and chitosan compositionsformulated for seed treatment are also commercially available.Commercial products include, for example, ELEXA® (Plant DefenseBoosters, Inc.) and BEYOND™ (Agrihouse, Inc.).

Flavonoids are phenolic compounds having the general structure of twoaromatic rings connected by a three-carbon bridge. Flavonoids areproduced by plants and have many functions, e.g., as beneficialsignaling molecules, and as protection against insects, animals, fungiand bacteria. Classes of flavonoids include chalcones, anthocyanidins,coumarins, flavones, flavanols, flavonols, flavanones, and isoflavones.See, Jain, et al., J. Plant Biochem. & Biotechnol. 11:1-10 (2002); Shaw,et al., Environmental Microbiol. 11:1867-80 (2006).

Representative flavonoids that may be useful in the practice of thepresent invention include genistein, daidzein, formononetin, naringenin,hesperetin, luteolin, and apigenin. Flavonoid compounds are commerciallyavailable, e.g., from Natland International Corp., Research TrianglePark, N.C.; MP Biomedicals, Irvine, Calif.; LC Laboratories, WoburnMass. Flavonoid compounds may be isolated from plants or seeds, e.g., asdescribed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,702,752; 5,990,291; and 6,146,668.Flavonoid compounds may also be produced by genetically engineeredorganisms, such as yeast, as described in Ralston, et al., PlantPhysiology 137:1375-88 (2005).

Jasmonic acid (JA, [1R-[1α,2β(Z)]]-3-oxo-2-(pentenyl)cyclopentaneaceticacid) and its derivatives (which include linoleic acid and linolenicacid (which are described above in connection with fatty acids and theirderivatives), may be used in the practice of the present invention.Jasmonic acid and its methyl ester, methyl jasmonate (MeJA),collectively known as jasmonates, are octadecanoid-based compounds thatoccur naturally in plants. Jasmonic acid is produced by the roots ofwheat seedlings, and by fungal microorganisms such as Botryodiplodiatheobromae and Gibberella fujikuroi, yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae),and pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli. Linoleicacid and linolenic acid are produced in the course of the biosynthesisof jasmonic acid. Like linoleic acid and linolenic acid, jasmonates (andtheir derivatives) are reported to be inducers of nod gene expression orLCO production by rhizobacteria. See, e.g., Mabood, Fazli, Jasmonatesinduce the expression of nod genes in Bradyrhizobium japonicum, May 17,2001.

Useful derivatives of jasmonic acid that may be useful in the practiceof the present invention include esters, amides, glycosides and salts.Representative esters are compounds in which the carboxyl group ofjasmonic acid has been replaced with a —COR group, where R is an —OR¹group, in which R¹ is: an alkyl group, such as a C₁-C₈ unbranched orbranched alkyl group, e.g., a methyl, ethyl or propyl group; an alkenylgroup, such as a C₂-C₈ unbranched or branched alkenyl group; an alkynylgroup, such as a C₂-C₈ unbranched or branched alkynyl group; an arylgroup having, for example, 6 to 10 carbon atoms; or a heteroaryl grouphaving, for example, 4 to 9 carbon atoms, wherein the heteroatoms in theheteroaryl group can be, for example, N, O, P, or S. Representativeamides are compounds in which the carboxyl group of jasmonic acid hasbeen replaced with a —COR group, where R is an NR²R³ group, in which R²and R³ are independently: hydrogen; an alkyl group, such as a C₁-C₈unbranched or branched alkyl group, e.g., a methyl, ethyl or propylgroup; an alkenyl group, such as a C₂-C₈ unbranched or branched alkenylgroup; an alkynyl group, such as a C₂-C₈ unbranched or branched alkynylgroup; an aryl group having, for example, 6 to 10 carbon atoms; or aheteroaryl group having, for example, 4 to 9 carbon atoms, wherein theheteroatoms in the heteroaryl group can be, for example, N, O, P, or S.Esters may be prepared by known methods, such as acid-catalyzednucleophilic addition, wherein the carboxylic acid is reacted with analcohol in the presence of a catalytic amount of a mineral acid. Amidesmay also be prepared by known methods, such as by reacting thecarboxylic acid with the appropriate amine in the presence of a couplingagent such as dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC), under neutral conditions.Suitable salts of jasmonic acid include e.g., base addition salts. Thebases that may be used as reagents to prepare metabolically acceptablebase salts of these compounds include those derived from cations such asalkali metal cations (e.g., potassium and sodium) and alkaline earthmetal cations (e.g., calcium and magnesium). These salts may be readilyprepared by mixing together a solution of linoleic acid, linolenic acid,or jasmonic acid with a solution of the base. The salt may beprecipitated from solution and be collected by filtration or may berecovered by other means such as by evaporation of the solvent.

Karrikins are vinylogous 4H-pyrones e.g., 2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-onesincluding derivatives and analogues thereof. Examples of these compoundsare represented by the following structure:

wherein; Z is O, S or NR₅; R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ are each independently H,alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, phenyl, benzyl, hydroxy, hydroxyalkyl, alkoxy,phenyloxy, benzyloxy, CN, COR₆, COOR═, halogen, NR₆R₇, or NO₂; and R₅,R₆, and R₇ are each independently H, alkyl or alkenyl, or a biologicallyacceptable salt thereof. Examples of biologically acceptable salts ofthese compounds may include acid addition salts formed with biologicallyacceptable acids, examples of which include hydrochloride, hydrobromide,sulphate or bisulphate, phosphate or hydrogen phosphate, acetate,benzoate, succinate, fumarate, maleate, lactate, citrate, tartrate,gluconate; methanesulphonate, benzenesulphonate and p-toluenesulphonicacid. Additional biologically acceptable metal salts may include alkalimetal salts, with bases, examples of which include the sodium andpotassium salts. Examples of compounds embraced by the structure andwhich may be suitable for use in the present invention include thefollowing: 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁=CH₃, R₂, R₃,R₄=H), 2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁, R₂, R₃, R4=H),7-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁, R₂, R₄=H, R₃=CH₃),5-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁, R₂, R₃=H, R₄=CH₃),3,7-dimethyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁, R₃=CH₃, R₂, R₄=H),3,5-dimethyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁, R₄=CH₃, R₂, R₃=H),3,5,7-trimethyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁, R₃, R₄=CH₃, R₂=H),5-methoxymethyl-3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (where R₁=CH₃, R₂,R₃=H, R₄=CH₂OCH₃), 4-bromo-3,7-dimethyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one (whereR₁, R₃=CH₃, R₂=Br, R₄=H), 3-methylfuro[2,3-c]pyridin-2(3H)-one (whereZ=NH, R₁=CH₃, R₂, R₃, R₄=H), 3,6-dimethylfuro[2,3-c]pyridin-2(6H)-one(where Z=N—CH₃, R₁=CH₃, R₂, R₃, R₄=H). See, U.S. Pat. No. 7,576,213.These molecules are also known as karrikins. See, Halford, supra.

The amount of the at least one plant signal molecule used to treat theseed, expressed in units of concentration, generally ranges from about10⁻⁵ to about 10⁻¹⁴ M (molar concentration), and in some embodiments,from about 10⁻⁵ to about 10⁻¹¹ M, and in some other embodiments fromabout 10⁻⁷ to about 10⁻⁸ M. Expressed in units of weight, the effectiveamount generally ranges from about 1 to about 400 μg/hundred weight(cwt) seed, and in some embodiments from about 2 to about 70 μg/cwt, andin some other embodiments, from about 2.5 to about 3.0 μg/cwt seed.

For purposes of treatment of seed indirectly, i.e., in-furrow treatment,the effective amount of the at least one plant signal molecule generallyranges from 1 μg/acre to about 70 μg/acre, and in some embodiments, fromabout 50 μg/acre to about 60 μg/acre. For purposes of application to theplants, the effective amount of the at least one plant signal moleculegenerally ranges from 1 μg/acre to about 30 μg/acre, and in someembodiments, from about 11 μg/acre to about 20 μg/acre.

Herbicides, Fungicides and Insecticides

Suitable herbicides include bentazon, acifluorfen, chlorimuron,lactofen, clomazone, fluazifop, glufosinate, glyphosate, sethoxydim,imazethapyr, imazamox, fomesafe, flumiclorac, imazaquin, and clethodim.Commercial products containing each of these compounds are readilyavailable. Herbicide concentration in the composition will generallycorrespond to the labeled use rate for a particular herbicide.

A “fungicide” as used herein and in the art, is an agent that kills orinhibits fungal growth. As used herein, a fungicide “exhibits activityagainst” a particular species of fungi if treatment with the fungicideresults in killing or growth inhibition of a fungal population (e.g., inthe soil) relative to an untreated population. Effective fungicides inaccordance with the invention will suitably exhibit activity against abroad range of pathogens, including but not limited to Phytophthora,Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Pythium, Phomopsis or Selerotinia and Phakopsoraand combinations thereof.

Commercial fungicides may be suitable for use in the present invention.Suitable commercially available fungicides include PROTÉGÉ, RIVAL orALLEGIANCE FL or LS (Gustafson, Plano, Tex.), WARDEN RTA (Agrilance, St.Paul, Minn.), APRON XL, APRON MAXX RTA or RFC, MAXIM 4FS or XL(Syngenta, Wilmington, Del.), CAPTAN (Arvesta, Guelph, Ontario) andPROTREAT (Nitragin Argentina, Buenos Ares, Argentina). Activeingredients in these and other commercial fungicides include, but arenot limited to, fludioxonil, mefenoxam, azoxystrobin and metalaxyl.Commercial fungicides are most suitably used in accordance with themanufacturer's instructions at the recommended concentrations.

As used herein, an insecticide “exhibits activity against” a particularspecies of insect if treatment with the insecticide results in killingor inhibition of an insect population relative to an untreatedpopulation. Effective insecticides in accordance with the invention willsuitably exhibit activity against a broad range of insects including,but not limited to, wireworms, cutworms, grubs, corn rootworm, seed cornmaggots, flea beetles, chinch bugs, aphids, leaf beetles, and stinkbugs.

Commercial insecticides may be suitable for use in the presentinvention. Suitable commercially-available insecticides include CRUISER(Syngenta, Wilmington, Del.), GAUCHO and PONCHO (Gustafson, Plano,Tex.). Active ingredients in these and other commercial insecticidesinclude thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and imidacloprid. Commercialinsecticides are most suitably used in accordance with themanufacturer's instructions at the recommended concentrations.

Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms, Diazotrophs (RhizobialInoculants), and/or Mycorrhizal Fungi

The present invention may further include treatment of the seed with aphosphate solubilizing microorganism. As used herein, “phosphatesolubilizing microorganism” is a microorganism that is able to increasethe amount of phosphorous available for a plant. Phosphate solubilizingmicroorganisms include fungal and bacterial strains. In embodiment, thephosphate solubilizing microorganism is a spore forming microorganism.

Non-limiting examples of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms includespecies from a genus selected from the group consisting ofAcinetobacter, Arthrobacter, Arthrobotrys, Aspergillus, Azospirillum,Bacillus, Burkholderia, Candida Chryseomonas, Enterobacter,Eupenicillium, Exiguobacterium, Klebsiella, Kluyvera, Microbacterium,Mucor, Paecilomyces, Paenibacillus, Penicillium, Pseudomonas, Serratia,Stenotrophomonas, Streptomyces, Streptosporangium, Swaminathania,Thiobacillus, Torulospora, Vibrio, Xanthobacter, and Xanthomonas.

Non-limiting examples of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms areselected from the group consisting Acinetobacter calcoaceticus,Acinetobacter sp, Arthrobacter sp., Arthrobotrys oligospora, Aspergillusniger, Aspergillus sp., Azospirillum halopraeferans, Bacillusamyloliquefaciens, Bacillus atrophaeus, Bacillus circulans, Bacilluslicheniformis, Bacillus subtilis, Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderiavietnamiensis, Candida krissii, Chryseomonas luteola, Enterobacteraerogenes, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter sp., Enterobactertaylorae, Eupenicillium parvum, Exiguobacterium sp., Klebsiella sp.,Kluyvera cryocrescens, Microbacterium sp., Mucor ramosissimus,Paecilomyces hepialid, Paecilomyces marquandii, Paenibacillus macerans,Paenibacillus mucilaginosus, Pantoea aglomerans, Penicillium expansum,Pseudomonas corrugate, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas lutea,Pseudomonas poae, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonastrivialis, Serratia marcescens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia,Streptomyces sp., Streptosporangium sp., Swaminathania salitolerans,Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Torulospora globosa, Vibrio proteolyticus,Xanthobacter agilis, and Xanthomonas campestris

In a particular embodiment, the phosphate solubilizing microorganism isa strain of the fungus Penicillium. Strains of the fungus Penicilliumthat may be useful in the practice of the present invention include P.bilaiae (formerly known as P. bilaii), P. albidum, P. aurantiogriseum,P. chrysogenum, P. citreonigrum, P. citrinum, P. digitatum, P.frequentas, P. fuscum, P. gaestrivorus, P. glabrum, P. griseofulvum, P.implicatum, P. janthinellum, P. lilacinum, P. minioluteum, P.montanense, P. nigricans, P. oxalicum, P. pinetorum, P. pinophilum, P.purpurogenum, P. radicans, P. radicum, P. raistrickii, P. rugulosum, P.simplicissimum, P. solitum, P. variabile, P. velutinum, P. viridicatum,P. glaucum, P. fussiporus, and P. expansum.

In one particular embodiment, the Penicillium species is P. bilaiae. Inanother particular embodiment the P. bilaiae strains are selected fromthe group consisting of ATCC 20851, NRRL 50169, ATCC 22348, ATCC 18309,NRRL 50162 (Wakelin, et al., 2004. Biol Fertil Soils 40:36-43). Inanother particular embodiment the Penicillium species is P.gaestrivorus, e.g., NRRL 50170 (see, Wakelin, supra.).

In some embodiments, more than one phosphate solubilizing microorganismis used, such as, at least two, at least three, at least four, at leastfive, at least 6, including any combination of the Acinetobacter,Arthrobacter, Arthrobotrys, Aspergillus, Azospirillum, Bacillus,Burkholderia, Candida Chryseomonas, Enterobacter, Eupenicillium,Exiguobacterium, Klebsiella, Kluyvera, Microbacterium, Mucor,Paecilomyces, Paenibacillus, Penicillium, Pseudomonas, Serratia,Stenotrophomonas, Streptomyces, Streptosporangium, Swaminathania,Thiobacillus, Torulospora, Vibrio, Xanthobacter, and Xanthomonas,including one species selected from the following group: Acinetobactercalcoaceticus, Acinetobacter sp, Arthrobacter sp., Arthrobotrysoligospora, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus sp., Azospirillumhalopraeferans, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus atrophaeus,Bacillus circulans, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis,Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Candida krissii,Chryseomonas luteola, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter asburiae,Enterobacter sp., Enterobacter taylorae, Eupenicillium parvum,Exiguobacterium sp., Klebsiella sp., Kluyvera cryocrescens,Microbacterium sp., Mucor ramosissimus, Paecilomyces hepialid,Paecilomyces marquandii, Paenibacillus macerans, Paenibacillusmucilaginosus, Pantoea aglomerans, Penicillium expansum, Pseudomonascorrugate, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas lutea, Pseudomonas poae,Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas trivialis,Serratia marcescens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Streptomyces sp.,Streptosporangium sp., Swaminathania salitolerans, Thiobacillusferrooxidans, Torulospora globosa, Vibrio proteolyticus, Xanthobacteragilis, and Xanthomonas campestris

In some embodiments, two different strains of the same species may alsobe combined, for example, at least two different strains of Penicilliumare used. The use of a combination of at least two different Penicilliumstrains has the following advantages. When applied to soil alreadycontaining insoluble (or sparingly soluble) phosphates, the use of thecombined fungal strains will result in an increase in the amount ofphosphorus available for plant uptake compared to the use of only onePenicillium strain. This in turn may result in an increase in phosphateuptake and/or an increase in yield of plants grown in the soil comparedto use of individual strains alone. The combination of strains alsoenables insoluble rock phosphates to be used as an effective fertilizerfor soils which have inadequate amounts of available phosphorus. Thus,in some embodiments, one strain of P. bilaiae and one strain of P.gaestrivorus are used. In other embodiments, the two strains are NRRL50169 and NRRL 50162. In further embodiments, the at least two strainsare NRRL 50169 and NRRL 50170. In yet further embodiments, the at leasttwo strains are NRRL 50162 and NRRL 50170.

The phosphate solubilizing microorganisms may be prepared using anysuitable method known to the person skilled in the art, such as, solidstate or liquid fermentation using a suitable carbon source. Thephosphate solubilizing microorganism is preferably prepared in the formof a stable spore.

In an embodiment, the phosphate solubilizing microorganism is aPenicillium fungus. The Penicillium fungus according to the inventioncan be grown using solid state or liquid fermentation and a suitablecarbon source. Penicillium isolates may be grown using any suitablemethod known to the person skilled in the art. For example, the fungusmay be cultured on a solid growth medium such as potato dextrose agar ormalt extract agar, or in flasks containing suitable liquid media such asCzapek-Dox medium or potato dextrose broth. These culture methods may beused in the preparation of an inoculum of Penicillium spp. for treating(e.g., coating) seeds and/or application to an agronomically acceptablecarrier to be applied to soil. The term “inoculum” as used in thisspecification is intended to mean any form of phosphate solubilizingmicroorganism, fungus cells, mycelium or spores, bacterial cells orbacterial spores, which is capable of propagating on or in the soil whenthe conditions of temperature, moisture, etc., are favorable for fungalgrowth.

Solid state production of Penicillium spores may be achieved byinoculating a solid medium such as a peat or vermiculite-basedsubstrate, or grains including, but not limited to, oats, wheat, barley,or rice. The sterilized medium (achieved through autoclaving orirradiation) is inoculated with a spore suspension (1×10²-1×10⁷ cfu/ml)of the appropriate Penicillium spp. and the moisture adjusted to 20 to50%, depending on the substrate. The material is incubated for 2 to 8weeks at room temperature. The spores may also be produced by liquidfermentation (Cunningham et al., 1990. Can J Bot. 68:2270-2274). Liquidproduction may be achieved by cultivating the fungus in any suitablemedia, such as potato dextrose broth or sucrose yeast extract media,under appropriate pH and temperature conditions that may be determinedin accordance with standard procedures in the art.

The resulting material may be used directly, or the spores may beharvested, concentrated by centrifugation, formulated, and then driedusing air drying, freeze drying, or fluid bed drying techniques(Friesen, et al., 2005, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 68:397-404) toproduce a wettable powder. The wettable powder is then suspended inwater, applied to the surface of seeds, and allowed to dry prior toplanting. The wettable powder may be used in conjunction with other seedtreatments, such as, but not limited to, chemical seed treatments,carriers (e.g., talc, clay, kaolin, silica gel, kaolinite) or polymers(e.g., methylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone). Alternatively, a sporesuspension of the appropriate Penicillium spp. may be applied to asuitable soil-compatible carrier (e.g., peat-based powder or granule) toappropriate final moisture content. The material may be incubated atroom temperature, typically for about 1 day to about 8 weeks, prior touse.

Aside from the ingredients used to cultivate the phosphate solubilizingmicroorganism, including, e.g., ingredients referenced above in thecultivation of Penicillium, the phosphate solubilizing microorganism maybe formulated using other agronomically acceptable carriers. As usedherein in connection with “carrier”, the term “agronomically acceptable”refers to any material which can be used to deliver the actives to aseed, soil or plant, and preferably which carrier can be added (to theseed, soil or plant) without having an adverse effect on plant growth,soil structure, soil drainage or the like. Suitable carriers comprise,but are not limited to, wheat chaff, bran, ground wheat straw,peat-based powders or granules, gypsum-based granules, and clays (e.g.,kaolin, bentonite, montmorillonite). When spores are added to the soil agranular formulation will be preferable. Formulations as liquid, peat,or wettable powder will be suitable for coating of seeds. When used tocoat seeds, the material can be mixed with water, applied to the seedsand allowed to dry. Example of yet other carriers include moistenedbran, dried, sieved and applied to seeds prior coated with an adhesive,e.g., gum arabic. In embodiments that entail formulation of the activesin a single composition, the agronomically acceptable carrier may beaqueous.

The amount of the at least one phosphate solubilizing microorganismvaries depending on the type of seed or soil, the type of crop plants,the amounts of the source of phosphorus and/or micronutrients present inthe soil or added thereto, etc. A suitable amount can be found by simpletrial and error experiments for each particular case. Normally, forPenicillium, for example, the application amount falls into the range of0.001-1.0 Kg fungal spores and mycelium (fresh weight) per hectare, or10²-10⁶ colony forming units (cfu) per seed (when coated seeds areused), or on a granular carrier applying between 1×10⁶ and 1×10¹¹ colonyforming units per hectare. The fungal cells in the form of e.g., sporesand the carrier can be added to a seed row of the soil at the root levelor can be used to coat seeds prior to planting.

In embodiments, for example, that entail use of at least two strains ofa phosphate solubilizing microorganism, such as, two strains ofPenicillium, commercial fertilizers may be added to the soil instead of(or even as well as) natural rock phosphate. The source of phosphorousmay contain a source of phosphorous native to the soil. In otherembodiments, the source of phosphorous may be added to the soil. In oneembodiment the source is rock phosphate. In another embodiment thesource is a manufactured fertilizer. Commercially available manufacturedphosphate fertilizers are of many types. Some common ones are thosecontaining monoammonium phosphate (MAP), triple super phosphate (TSP),diammonium phosphate, ordinary superphosphate and ammoniumpolyphosphate. All of these fertilizers are produced by chemicalprocessing of insoluble natural rock phosphates in large scalefertilizer-manufacturing facilities and the product is expensive. Bymeans of the present invention it is possible to reduce the amount ofthese fertilizers applied to the soil while still maintaining the sameamount of phosphorus uptake from the soil.

In a further embodiment, the source or phosphorus is organic. An organicfertilizer refers to a soil amendment derived from natural sources thatguarantees, at least, the minimum percentages of nitrogen, phosphate,and potash. Examples include plant and animal by-products, rock powders,seaweed, inoculants, and conditioners. Specific representative examplesinclude bone meal, meat meal, animal manure, compost, sewage sludge, orguano.

Other fertilizers, such as nitrogen sources, or other soil amendmentsmay of course also be added to the soil at approximately the same timeas the phosphate solubilizing microorganism or at other times, so longas the other materials are not toxic to the fungus.

Diazotrophs are bacteria and archaea that fix atmospheric nitrogen gasinto a more usable form such as ammonia. Examples of diazotrophs includebacteria from the genera Rhizobium spp. (e.g., R. cellulosilyticum, R.daejeonense, R. etli, R. galegae, R. gallicum, R. giardinii, R.hainanense, R. huautlense, R. indigoferae, R. leguminosarum, R.loessense, R. lupini, R. lusitanum, R. meliloti, R. mongolense, R.miluonense, R. sullae, R. tropici, R. undicola, and/or R. yanglingense),Bradyrhizobium spp. (e.g., B. bete, B. canariense, B. elkanii, B.iriomotense, B. japonicum, B. jicamae, B. liaoningense, B. pachyrhizi,and/or B. yuanmingense), Azorhizobium spp. (e.g., A. caulinodans and/orA. doebereinerae), Sinorhizobium spp. (e.g., S. abri, S. adhaerens, S.americanum, S. aboris, S. fredii, S. indiaense, S. kostiense, S.kummerowiae, S. medicae, S. meliloti, S. mexicanus, S. morelense, S.saheli, S. terangae, and/or S. xinjiangense), Mesorhizobium spp., (M.albiziae, M. amorphae, M. chacoense, M. ciceri, M. huakuii, M. loti, M.mediterraneum, M. pluifarium, M. septentrionale, M. temperatum, and/orM. tianshanense), and combinations thereof. In a particular embodiment,the diazotroph is selected from the group consisting of B. japonicum, Rleguminosarum, R meliloti, S. meliloti, and combinations thereof. Inanother embodiment, the diazotroph is B. japonicum. In anotherembodiment, the diazotroph is R leguminosarum. In another embodiment,the diazotroph is R meliloti. In another embodiment, the diazotroph isS. meliloti.

Mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with the roots of avascular plant, and provide, e.g., absorptive capacity for water andmineral nutrients due to the comparatively large surface area ofmycelium. Mycorrhizal fungi include endomycorrhizal fungi (also calledvesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae, VAMs, arbuscular mycorrhizae, or AMs),an ectomycorrhizal fungi, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment,the mycorrhizal fungi is an endomycorrhizae of the phylum Glomeromycotaand genera Glomus and Gigaspora. In still a further embodiment, theendomycorrhizae is a strain of Glomus aggregatum, Glomus brasilianum,Glomus clarum, Glomus deserticola, Glomus etunicatum, Glomusfasciculatum, Glomus intraradices, Glomus monosporum, or Glomus mosseae,Gigaspora margarita, or a combination thereof.

Examples of mycorrhizal fungi include ectomycorrhizae of the phylumBasidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Zygomycota. Other examples include astrain of Laccaria bicolor, Laccaria laccata, Pisolithus tinctorius,Rhizopogon amylopogon, Rhizopogon fulvigleba, Rhizopogon luteolus,Rhizopogon villosuli, Scleroderma cepa, Scleroderma citrinum, or acombination thereof.

The mycorrhizal fungi include ecroid mycorrhizae, arbutoid mycorrhizae,or monotropoid mycorrhizae. Arbuscular and ectomycorrhizae form ericoidmycorrhiza with many plants belonging to the order Ericales, while someEricales form arbutoid and monotropoid mycorrhizae. In one embodiment,the mycorrhiza may be an ericoid mycorrhiza, preferably of the phylumAscomycota, such as Hymenoscyphous ericae or Oidiodendron sp. In anotherembodiment, the mycorrhiza also may be an arbutoid mycorrhiza,preferably of the phylum Basidiomycota. In yet another embodiment, themycorrhiza may be a monotripoid mycorrhiza, preferably of the phylumBasidiomycota. In still yet another embodiment, the mycorrhiza may be anorchid mycorrhiza, preferably of the genus Rhizoctonia.

The methods of the present invention are applicable to leguminous seed,representative examples of which include soybean, alfalfa, peanut, pea,lentil, bean and clover. The methods of the present invention are alsoapplicable to non-leguminous seed, e.g., Poaceae, Cucurbitaceae,Malvaceae, Asteraceae, Chenopodiaceae and Solonaceae. Representativeexamples of non-leguminous seed include field crops such as corn, rice,oat, rye, barley and wheat, cotton and canola, and vegetable crops suchas potatoes, tomatoes, cucumbers, beets, lettuce and cantaloupe.

The invention will now be described in terms of the followingnon-limiting examples. Unless indicated to the contrary, water was usedas the control (indicated as “control” or “CHK”).

EXAMPLES 1-17: Greenhouse Experiments Example 1: In Vitro TomatoSeedling Root Growth Bioassay

Tomato seeds of hybrid tomato var. Royal Mounty were surface sterilizedwith 10% bleach solution for 10 minutes followed by 3 rinses withsterilized distilled water. Seeds were then dried in a laminar air flowhood for 3 hours. Seeds were then placed in petri-dishes on solidifiedagar medium containing various concentrations of different sources ofthe LCO illustrated in FIG. 1b (manufactured by Darmstadt, Germany andGrenoble, France) (also referred to in the examples as the “soybeanLCO”) and the inventive CO illustrated in FIG. 2a (also referred to inthe examples as the “pea CO” or “CO-V”). Seedling roots were measured bya hand ruler and root fresh weights were taken in a micro balance at day7. Growth study was done in a growth chamber at 22° C.

As reflected by the comparison between Pea CO (inventive embodiment) andLCOs (non-inventive and comparable), the pea CO exhibited better (at10⁻⁷M and 10⁻⁹M) or equal (at 10⁻⁸M) to LCO when tomato seedling rootlength was measured (FIG. 5). In terms of seedling root fresh weight,Pea CO outperformed LCO at all three levels of concentrations (FIG. 6).Both LCOs and CO were significantly better than control seedlings inincreasing root length and fresh weight. When the average root growthfrom all 3 concentrations was plotted, it appeared to be that CO issignificantly better than LCOs in increasing tomato root growth (FIGS. 7and 8).

Example 2: Cotton Foliar Experiment

Cotton seeds were planted and grown to V4 stage (4 leaved stages) andthen were sprayed with 10⁻⁸M of the LCO illustrated in FIG. 2b (alsoreferred to in the examples as the “Pea LCO”) and the pea CO and thenleft to grow up to 4 weeks with occasional watering with Hoaglandsolution. Control plants were sprayed with water.

The results achieved by the inventive embodiment (CO) showed that bothCO and LCO (non-inventive and comparable) significantly increased plantfresh weights over control but CO showed 1.14% more plant fresh weightincrease over LCO (FIG. 9).

Example 3: Corn Seed Treatment

Two seed treatment experiments using only Pea LCO, Pea CO and the COmixtures obtained from chitosan by enzymatic process (structurallydistinct from the Pea CO, and also referred to in the examples as the“China CO”) were performed in greenhouse. Hybrid corn seeds (92L90,Peterson Farm, USA) were treated with treatment solution (10-8 M) at therate of 3 fl oz/100 lbs of seed. Seeds were planted in plastic potscontaining 1:1 Sand:Perlite mixture. Seeds were allowed to grow forabout 3-4 weeks and then they were harvested and their dry weightmeasured.

Results obtained from both experiments indicated that inventive (pea CO)showed greater shoot, root and total biomass increase over non-inventiveand comparable LCO. For the first trial CO had 11.84% dry weightincrease over LCO (FIG. 10). In the second trial, CO had 12.63% dryweight-increase over LCO (FIG. 11). China CO, which may also beconsidered as a substitute source of pea CO, also demonstrated increasedplant dry weight increase as compared to non-inventive LCO.

Example 4: Treatment of Soybean with Various Actives

Soybean seeds (Jung seed, var. 8168NRR) were treated with various activemolecules. Seeds were treated with a liquid dose rate of 3 fl oz/100 lbsof seed. Seeds were allowed to dry for a 2 hours and planted ingreenhouse in plastic pots containing 1:1 sand:perlite mixture.Seedlings were grown for 4 wks with occasional liquid fertilizerapplications and then the plants were harvested. The central leafletfrom the 2^(nd) trifoliate (from down to top) was isolated and measuredfor surface area on a WinRhizo scanner. The rest of the plants were usedfor plant dry weight (DW).

Results obtained from the experiment elucidated that non-inventive peaLCO, the inventive pea CO and the China CO showed significant increasein leaf surface area. But among these three actives, the pea CO producedthe highest leaf surface area (significantly higher than the control(water)) and relatively higher than Chinese CO (FIG. 12). In anotherexperiment, CO produced the highest plant dry weights in terms of eithershoot, or root or total plant biomass. Thus, it was evident that thebiomass increase by CO was better than the soybean LCO or any othertreatments including water as a control and isoflavonoids as a separateplant signal molecule (FIG. 13).

Example 5: Root Hair Deformation Bioassay

Siratro (Macroptelium atropurpureum) seeds were germinated on moistfilter paper in petriplates. When seedlings roots are about 1-incheslong, they are severed from the seedlings and treated with 2 ml of 10⁻⁸Mtreatment solutions in test tubes for 4 hours in the dark. Aftertreatment time is over the solutions are dyed with Congo Red for 10minutes. After that root segments are observed under a compoundmicroscope to count the number of deformed root hairs in the mostsensitive zone of the root segment. Root hair deformation bioassay wasalso performed using Red Clover in a similar fashion like Siratro aboveand only visual observation was made and recorded in text form.

Both LCO and CO solutions induced root hair deformation in the rootsegments (FIG. 14). CO and fatty acid (Stearic acid or Palmitic acid)combinations also showed root hair deformation with CO plus Palmiticacid and CO plus both Palmitic acid and Stearic acid providingnumerically better root hair deformation than the LCO or CO. Overall, COwas equal to LCO in root hair deformation response. Palmitic acidaddition improved deformation response. Control or CHK was treated withdistilled water.

Root hair deformation pattern in Red Clover was much better andprominent for CO as compared to LCO. CO with either Palmitic acid orStearic acid had similar deformation pattern like LCO. Overall, CO wasthe best root hair deformer in Red Clover.

Example 6: Canola and Wheat Seed Germination

In petriplates on moist filter paper moistened with 10⁻⁹ M treatmentsolution, canola and wheat seeds were plated for germination. At 18 hafter plating, Pea CO induced more canola and wheat seed germination ascompared to Pea LCO. Over the period of 21 to 24 hours, seed germinationrate for LCO and CO leveled up. The experiment shows an earlygermination induction by CO over LCO (FIGS. 15 and 16).

Example 7: Alfalfa Seed Germination

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seeds were germinated in petriplates on moistfilter paper containing Pea LCO and Pea CO treatment solutions (10⁻⁸ M)and petriplates were kept in the dark at room temperature (22° C.).After 20 and 27 h, the seeds were observed for germination. At 20 h,there was no difference in germination rate among control, LCO and CObut at 27 h, CO showed 6% more germination over control and LCO. Itshowed that Pea LCO may not be effective on alfalfa seeds but pea COcould positively impact seed germination over control and pea LCO (FIG.17).

Example 8: Corn and Wheat Seed Germination in Petriplates

Corn and wheat seeds were plated in petriplates containing 5 ml oftreatment solution on a filter paper. Corn seeds were placed on moistfilter paper for germination. Similarly, wheat seeds (spring wheat) wereplaced in petriplates. Corn and wheat seeds were observed for germinatedseedlings 5 days after plating. Roots were harvested and their lengthmeasured by WinRhizo system.

In corn, Pea LCO, Pea CO and CO with Palmitic acid showed increasedgermination (FIG. 18) and they significantly increased seedling rootlength over control as well. Their effect was not statisticallydifferent, CO with Palmitic acid being the highest for germination androot length. Addition of Palmitic acid with CO seemed to be slightlybeneficial (not statistically) over LCO or CO (FIG. 19). In wheat, COoutperformed LCO by producing longer roots. The increase in root lengthby LCO and CO in wheat was not statistically significant butconsistently greater (FIG. 20).

Example 9: Common Vetch (Vicia sativa) Seed Germination

Common vetch seeds were plated in petriplates containing 5 ml oftreatment solutions on filter paper. Seed germination at 22° C. wascounted after 24 h and seedling root length was measured at day 5 withWinRhizo system.

In germination experiment Pea LCO, and Pea CO in combination with 4different fatty acids were used. It was found that CO alone or witheither Palmitic acid or Stearic acid induced early seed germination. Oneday after plating in petriplates, CO had 25% more germination overcontrol and LCO (FIG. 21). When root length was measured, only LCO andCO with Palmitic acid significantly increased seedling root length overcontrol (FIG. 22).

Example 10: Seed Germination in Multiple Crops

Similar to the seed germination experiment mentioned above, seeds ofdifferent crops were placed on moist filter paper in petriplatescontaining 5 ml liquid in each. Petriplates with seeds were then kept inthe dark at 22° C. After 24 h (except for Lab Lab which was 30 h), seedswere observed for germination.

Overall seed germination by Pea CO was better than Pea LCO. Out of fourcrops (Green Mung, Lab Lab, Red Lentil and Red Clover), CO showed bettergermination in three crops except for Red Lentil (FIG. 23). CO plusPalmitic acid induced the highest germination in Green Mung and RedClover. LCO was only better than CO or CO plus Palmitic acid for RedLentil.

Example 11: Tomato Seedling Root Growth

In petriplate seed germination process, tomato Var. Royal Mounty seedsware placed on moist filter paper soaked with 5 ml treatment solution.At 22° C. and after 5 days in dark, tomato seedling roots were measuredfor growth by WinRhizo system.

Pea LCO, Pea CO and CO with fatty acids all showed increased root lengthas compared to water control. Average seedling root length by CO wasbetter than LCO but it was not significantly better. CO with eitherPalmitic or Stearic acid significantly increased tomato seedling rootlength (FIG. 24).

Example 12: Soybean Seed Treatment

Soybean seeds (Pioneer 9oM80) were plated in petriplates on moistgermination paper soaked with 5 ml of treatment solution containingeither water or Soybean LCO, Pea CO and CO plus fatty acids. Seedlingradicles were isolated after 48 hours and measured for their length.

LCO showed better seed radicle growth enhancement over control and CObut it was CO plus Stearic acid or Palmitic acid that exhibitedsignificant increase in radicle length. CO itself is less effective thatLCO on soybean but addition of fatty acid either Palmitic or Stearicacid with CO could further enhance seedling radical growth (FIG. 25).

Example 13: Cotton Seed Treatment

Cotton seeds were treated with LCO and CO 10⁻⁸ M treatment solutions ata dose rate of 3 fl oz/100 lbs of seed. Seeds were planted the very nextday in plastic pots containing 1:1 sand:perlite mixture. Seeds weregrown in greenhouse for 4 wks and then they were harvested.

There were no significant differences in cotton plant dry weight forcontrol, LCO and CO. However, CO produced relatively higher plant dryweight over control and LCO. The total plant dry weight increased by COover control was 3.29% (FIG. 26).

Example 14: Soybean Foliar Treatment with Various Actives

Soybean plants (Jung seed, var. 8168NRR) were treated with variousactive molecules at V4 growth stage. Plant were grown from seeds ingreenhouse in plastic pots containing 1:1 sand:perlite mixture.Seedlings were grown for 4 wks with occasional liquid fertilizerapplications and then the plants were harvested.

Foliar application of soybean LCO, Pea CO or China-CO had no significanteffect on plant dry biomass increase (FIG. 27). The biomass for each ofLCO, CO and China-CO was relatively higher than the control plants, withthe actives equally effective.

Example 15: Corn Seed Application

Corn seeds were treated with various combinations of Pea CO (10⁻⁸ M) andPea LCO (10⁻⁸, 10⁻⁹ M). Seeds were planted in greenhouse plastic potscontaining 1:1 sand:perlite mixture. Seedlings were harvested 10 daysafter planting, washed clean and then dried in an oven at 60 C for 48hr.

As illustrated in FIG. 28, both CO (10⁻⁸ M) (designated CO8) and LCO(10⁻⁸ M)(designated SP8) alone increased corn seedling dry weight. Onlythe LCO at 10⁻⁹/CO at 10⁻⁸ combination increased corn seedling dryweight more than either Pea LCO (SP) or Pea CO.

Example 16: Sorghum Seed Germination in Petriplates

Sorghum seeds were germinated in petriplates containing liquid treatmentsolutions. Seedlings were harvested after 5 days and their roots weremeasured using WinRHIZO scanner. As illustrated in FIG. 29, both Pea CO(10⁻⁸ M) and Pea LCO (10⁻⁸ M) increased seedling root length and thecombination of CO at 10⁻⁸ and LCO at 10⁻⁹ increased seedling root lengthmore than the increase with either CO or LCO alone.

Example 17: Cotton Foliar Application

Cotton plants were grown from seeds in greenhouse plastic potscontaining sand:perlite in a 1:1 mixture. When seedlings were at theV-stage, they were foliar-sprayed with Pea CO (10⁻⁸ M) and CO plusmicronutrients (Ca-pantothenate and boric acid), each in minute amounts.

Plants were harvested 4 wks after treatment. Before harvest, leafgreenness was measured by SPAD chlorophyll meter. As illustrated inFIGS. 30 and 31, CO significantly increased leaf greenness and produceda numerical increase in average dry plant weight compared to control,and the combination treatment with CO and micronutrients achieved aneven greater increase.

18-20: Field Trials Example 18: Soybean

Nineteen field trials were conducted to evaluate embodiments of thepresent invention on grain yield when applied to soybean foliage. Thefield trials were conducted in eight states with various soilcharacteristics and environmental conditions.

The treatments used in the trials were control (water), pure CO(chitooligosaccharide)—CO-V (illustrated in FIG. 2a ) and pure LCO(lipo-chitooligosaccharide)—SP104 (illustrated in FIG. 2b ). CO and LCOtreatments were 8×10⁻⁸ molar concentration resulting in 12 μg/acreapplied. Different commercial soybean varieties were employed.Treatments were added to glyphosate herbicide and sprayed on the foliageat plant vegetative stage V4 to V5. Four ounces per acre of thetreatment was combined with the herbicide and water was applied at arate of 5 to 10 gallons per acre. Soybeans were grown to maturity,harvested and grain yield determined.

The results are set forth in Table 1.

YIELD (bu/A) Control LCO (SP104) CO (CO-V) Mean (N = 19) 56.5 58.3 58.2Response (bu/A) 1.8 1.7 Response Increase (% of Control) 3% 3% PositiveYield Response (%) 68.4 68.4

As reflected by comparison between Control and CO, the yield wasenhanced by foliar CO treatment by 1.7 bu/A, resulting in a 3% increaseover the Control, and a positive yield enhancement occurred in 68.4% ofthe trials.

In comparison to the foliar LCO response, the CO mean yield was 0.1bu/A, less, but the same percent yield increase over the Control and thesame percent positive yield enhancement. Therefore, both CO and LCOprovided substantially equal yield enhancements as a foliar treatment.

Example 19: Corn

Sixteen (16) field trials were conducted to evaluate embodiments of thepresent invention on grain yield when applied to corn foliage. The fieldtrials were conducted in eight states with various soil characteristicsand environmental conditions.

The treatments used in the trials were Control (water), pure CO(chitooligosaccharide)—CO-V (illustrated in FIG. 2a ) and pure LCO(lipo-chitooligosaccharide)—SP104 (illustrated in FIG. 2b ). Differentcommercial corn hybrids were employed. Treatments were added toglyphosate herbicide and sprayed on the foliage at the time of normalherbicide application. Four ounces per acre of the treatments werecombined with the herbicide, plus water and applied at a rate of 5 to 10gallons per acre. Corn was grown to maturity, harvested and grain yielddetermined.

TABLE 2 YIELD (bu/A) Control LCO (SP104) CO (CO-V) Mean (N = 16) 192.6196.8 201.8 Response (bu/A) 4.2 9.2 Response Increase (% of Control) 2.24.8 Positive Yield Response (%) 75.0 93.8

As reflected by comparison between Control and CO, the yield wasenhanced by foliar CO treatment by 9.2 bu/A, resulting in a 4.8% yieldincrease over Control, and a positive yield enhancement occurred in93.8% of the trials.

In comparison to the foliar LCO response, the CO mean yield was 5.0 bu/Abetter, providing a 2.6% higher yield increase, and the trials with apositive response was 18.8% better.

Therefore, both CO and LCO provided yield enhancements as a foliartreatment, but the CO performed at least twice better than the LCO.

Example 20: Corn

Ten field trials were conducted to evaluate embodiments of the presentinvention on grain yield when applied to corn seed before planting. Fivefield trials were conducted in five states, and five trials wereconducted in Argentina.

The treatments used in the trials were Control (water), pure CO(chitooligosaccharide)—CO-V (illustrated in FIG. 2a ) and pure LCO(lipo-chitooligosaccharide)—SP104 (illustrated in FIG. 2b ). CO and LCOtreatments were 1×10⁻⁸ molar concentration resulting in 1 μg/acreapplied. Different commercial corn hybrids were employed. Three fluidounces of the treatment were applied to fifty (50) pounds of seed beforeplanting. Corn was grown to maturity, harvested and grain yielddetermined.

The results are set forth in Table 3.

YIELD (bu/A) Control LCO (SP104) CO (CO-V) Mean (N = 10) 181.5 192.6188.0 Response (bu/A) 11.1 6.5 Response Increase (% of Control) 6.1 3.6Positive Yield Response (%) 90.0 80.0

As reflected by comparison between Control and CO, the yield wasenhanced by seed application of CO treatment by 6.5 bu/A, resulting in a3.6% increase over the Control, and a positive yield enhancementoccurred in 80.0% of the trials.

In comparison between CO and LCO, the CO mean yield was 4.6 bu/A less,resulting in 2.5% less yield increase above the Control, and 10.0% lesspositive yield responses amongst the ten trials.

Both the CO and LCO treatments provided yield enhancement above theControl when applied to corn seed, with the LCO providing the highestresponse.

All patent and non-patent publications cited in this specification areindicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to whichthis invention pertains. All these publications are herein incorporatedby reference to the same extent as if each individual publication orpatent application were specifically and individually indicated to beincorporated by reference.

Although the invention herein has been described with reference toparticular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodimentsare merely illustrative of the principles and applications of thepresent invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerousmodifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that otherarrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scopeof the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

1-20. (canceled)
 21. A method, comprising introducing at least onechitin oligomer into a plant growth medium in an amount sufficient toenhance the growth and/or yield of a plant grown therein, wherein saidchitin oligomer is not a lipo-chitooligosaccharide.
 22. The method ofclaim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomer comprises at leastone chitin oligomer represented by the formula:

in which R₁ represents hydrogen or methyl; R₂ represents hydrogen ormethyl; R₃ represents hydrogen, acetyl or carbamoyl; R₄ representshydrogen, acetyl or carbamoyl; R₅ represents hydrogen, acetyl orcarbamoyl; R₆ represents hydrogen, arabinosyl, fucosyl, acetyl, sulfateester, 3-0-S-2-0-MeFuc, 2-0-MeFuc, or 4-0-AcFuc; R₇ represents hydrogen,mannosyl or glycerol; R₈ represents hydrogen, methyl, or —CH₂OH; R₉represents hydrogen, arabinosyl, or fucosyl; Rio represents hydrogen,acetyl or fucosyl; and n represents 0, 1, 2 or
 3. 23. The method ofclaim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomer comprises at leastone chitin oligomer represented by the formula:

wherein n=1 or 2; R₁ represents hydrogen or methyl; and R₂ representshydrogen or SO₃H.
 24. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least onechitin oligomer comprises a chitin oligomer represented by thestructure:


25. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomercomprises a chitin oligomer represented by the structure:


26. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomercomprises a chitin oligomer represented by the structure:


27. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomercomprises a chitin oligomer represented by the structure:


28. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomer isintroduced into said plant growth medium at a concentration ranging fromabout 10⁻¹⁴ to about 10⁻⁵ Molar.
 29. The method of claim 21, whereinsaid at least one chitin oligomer is introduced into said plant growthmedium at a concentration ranging from about 10⁻¹¹ to about 10⁻⁵ Molar.30. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one chitin oligomer isintroduced into said plant growth medium at a concentration ranging fromabout 10⁻⁸ to about 10⁻⁵ Molar.
 31. The method of claim 21, wherein saidplant growth medium is field soil.
 32. The method of claim 31, whereinsaid at least one chitin oligomer is introduced into said field soil ata rate of about 1 to about 70 μg per acre.
 33. The method of claim 31,wherein said at least one chitin oligomer is introduced into said fieldsoil at a rate of about 50 to about 60 μg per acre.
 34. The method ofclaim 21, wherein said plant is a cereal plant.
 35. The method of claim21, wherein said plant is a corn plant.
 36. The method of claim 21,wherein said plant is a wheat plant.
 37. The method of claim 21, whereinsaid plant is an alfalfa plant.
 38. The method of claim 21, wherein saidplant is a cotton plant.
 39. The method of claim 21, wherein said plantis a leguminous plant.
 40. The method of claim 21, wherein said plant isa soybean plant.